Hochstein v. Berghauser
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Appeal from an interlocutory decree in partition. The property involved herein originally belonged to John Berghauser, who, by an instrument bearing date October 31, 1873, conveyed to his wife, Margarethe, an undivided third part thereof, with the exception of one parcel, to be hereinafter mentioned. At that date an action for divorce was pending between the parties, and an agreement was entered into between them providing that in case the court should render a judgment of divorce Berghauser should convey to his wife certain described property, .including an undivided third of a portion of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hearne v. Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- In re the Estate of DobbelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by36 opinions
- Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Kunakoff v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Krebs Hop Co. v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.