Pluth v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the estate of a deceased partner against the surviving partners after an accounting. The undisputed facts which form the background for this action are as follows:
John L. Thies and defendant Joseph Smith had been in business together since about 1931. In 1938 they entered into a written agreement of partnership to operate an automobile service station. Each partner was to share equally. On January 6,1939, Thies and Smith and Smith’s wife, the defendant Hazel Smith, entered into a written partnership agreement whereby the 1938 agreement was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Bakewell v. BakewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Logoluso v. LogolusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Wilkison v. WiederkehrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Jones v. Wingo (In Re Wingo)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- California Pacific Title Co. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.