Sullivan v. Moorhead
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
October 10,1889, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into an agreement for the exchange of lands, by which the defendant agreed to convey to the plaintiffs certain property in Los Angeles “ known as lots ten (10), eleven (11), twelve (12), and thirteen (13), in the Pomeroy and Mills subdivision of the Hollenbeck tract, containing about two hundred (200) feet front, and one hundred and ten (110) feet in depth, together with the houses thereon known as Hos. 706 to 712, Hew Main Street, inclusive.” In purported execution of this agreement the defendant on the seventeenth day of December, 1889,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hutchinson v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wilson v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Higgins v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by27 opinions
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.