Legal Opinion

Lyle v. Cunningham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1914No. 11568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered July 29, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to reform a real estate contract, and for other relief.

*421The facts are as follows: On the 14th day of December, 1909, the plaintiff J. L. McMurray purchased from the defendants the following described real estate. The NE^4 of the SW% of lot 7, sec. 20, Twp. 20, Range 4, E. W. M., containing 59.67 acres, according to the government survey; also, a strip of land 16 feet wide along the east side of lot 16 of said section and township, used for a private road to the county road. The purchase price was $18,000, of which $9,000 was paid in cash. The remaining $9,000 was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sears v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Freeman v. GloydWashington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darnell v. NoelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lou v. Bethany Lutheran Church of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Pratt v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Dieterich v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Greenwood v. BeanWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API