Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1925No. 18919. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action for damages upon the ground of fraud in the sale of real estate, and for the abatement of the purchase money notes and mortgage in the amount of the damage found. Appellants deny the material allegations of the complaint and set up two affirmative defenses—laches and the statute of limitations. The trial judge found damages in favor of respondents in the sum of $2,000 and costs, and gave judgment abating the purchase money note and mortgage against the appellants in that sum. The undisputed facts may be summarized as follows:

In May, 1920, respondents approached appellants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sears v. StinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Freeman v. GloydWashington Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Liner v. Armstrong Homes of Bremerton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Algee v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jacquot v. Farmers Straw Gas Producer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API