Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Noel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1949No. 30985PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Simpson, J.-

— -Plaintiffs instituted their action as purchasers against defendants as sellers for rescission of the sale of real and personal property on the ground of fraudulent representations by the defendants as to a portion of the boundary line enclosing the real estate. The court entered its decree in favor of plaintiffs, rescinding the sale and giving them judgment for the purchase price, less certain credits for rents received.

Defendants, on appeal to this court, make ten assignments of error which are sufficient to challenge the decree, the amount of rents received, and the court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dixon v. MacGillivrayWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Thomas v. McCueWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brooks v. JensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Holland Furnace Co. v. KorthWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Power v. EsareyWashington Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API