Legal Opinion

Sears v. Stinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1892No. 279PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Action by H. A. Sears against F. L. Stinson for damages for breach of contract to convey certain land. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Plaintiff purchased of defendant block three of Bellevue addition to the city of Seattle, consisting of twenty-two lots, for the sum of two thousand dollars, receiving therefor a warranty deed. The lots were represented on the plat which defendant exhibited to plaintiff as being twenty-five feet wide and one hundred feet in depth. Some time after the purchase, plaintiff in having the block surveyed discovered that defendant did not have title to a strip of land about sixty feet in width running across the north side of said block, owing to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. TompkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Tyler v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Davis v. NuzumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Smith v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Doyle v. HordTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Cawston v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API