Legal Opinion

Dieterich v. Rice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1923No. 17679PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

— In October, 1919, respondent, in the present appeal, brought an action to annul and rescind a contract entered into between these parties for the purchase of a farm in Pend Oreille county, and to recover the sum paid on the purchase price, based on *614fraud and deceit. A clause for the protection of the vendor reciting inspection by the vendee, and stipulating that no oral representations or inducements, or changes in the contract, unless made in writing and signed, whether previously or subsequently made, would be binding on either party, being a part of the written contract, the lower court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dieterich v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Yarnall v. Knickerbocker Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Mackay v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mulholland v. Washington Match Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gould v. JamesWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. da Ponte v. SimonianWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API