Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Tompkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1891No. 191PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*509The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

—This was an action brought upon a promissory note for §350 not yet due, and for §50 attorney’s fee, with an allegation that defendants were about to remove from the State of Washington and the United States, refusing to make arrangement for securing the payment of said debt, with prayer for judgment, and for the issuance of a writ of attachment. Affidavit for attachment was filed. The answer admits the execution of the note, and alleges want of consideration! alleges the fact to be that plaintiff sold defendants a certain tract of land for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Litchfield v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Milliken v. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Lawson v. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API