Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1979No. 76-6677, SC 25457PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*483DENECKE, C. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict against it in a damage action.

The plaintiff contends the appeal should be dismissed because the defendant failed to timely file its notice of appeal. The notice was not filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment appealed from, but it was filed within 30 days from the date of the order denying a motion by defendant captioned, "Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict.” ORS 19.026(2) provides:

"Where any party has served and filed a motion for a new trial or a motion for judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dickman v. School District No. 62cOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Weigel v. Ron Tonkin Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wolf Ex Rel. Wolf v. Nordstrom, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API