Legal Opinion

Eitel v. Times, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1960PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff alleges that at about 8:55 p. m., January 7, 1956, she tripped on a wire on the sidewalk in front of the bus terminal operated by Gorst & King, a corporation, in North Bend, Oregon. Plaintiff contends that the wire had been taken from a bundle of newspapers deposited by the defendant on the sidewalk near the scene of the accident and as a result of defendant’s negligent conduct in causing the wire to be left on the sidewalk the plaintiff was injured.

At…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Bock v. Fellman Dry Goods Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hall v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1996
  4. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API