Legal Opinion

Weigel v. Ron Tonkin Chevrolet Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1984No. TC A8106-03272 CA A25638 S 30373PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

The Unlawful Trade Practices Act makes it an unlawful practice for a person to represent in the course of business “that real estate or goods are original or new if they are deteriorated, altered, reconditioned, reclaimed, used or second-hand.” ORS 646.608(1)(f). The chief issue in the present case is whether an automobile dealer violated this provision in selling as new a car that an earlier customer conditionally contracted to buy and took home but returned for lack of financing. We hold that an automobile is “used” rather than “new” within the meaning of the statute when a dealer…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Baldassari v. Public Finance TrustMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Miller v. American Family Pub.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hernandez v. VICKERY CHEVROLET-OLDS. CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API