Legal Opinion

Hoekstre v. Golden B. Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1985No. 98,450, 127,420; CA A31718PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant Rudie (defendant) appeals from a judgment in a legal malpractice case. The malpractice was alleged to have occurred during his representation of Golden B. Products, Inc. (Golden B.) and Harrison, president of Golden B., in a shareholder’s derivative suit, which will be referred to as “the Hoekstre case.” Harrison, plaintiff in the instant action, charged defendant with negligence in his representation at trial and on appeal of the Hoekstre case. He specifically alleged that defendant was negligent in failing to file proper motions, in inadequately preparing for trial, in failing to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SpeerstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Junction City Water Control DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Crooks v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bock v. ZittenfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Childers v. SpindorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Osborne v. O'REILLYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Farhang v. KariminaserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Farhang v. KariminaserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API