Legal Opinion

Noe v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1967PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for damages because of an unauthorized circumcision. Defendants appealed from that portion of the judgment, entered on a jury verdict, which assessed punitive damages.

Plaintiff’s parents contracted with the defendant, Kaiser Foundations Health Plan of Oregon, for the furnishing of medical and hospital services to their family. The other defendants are corporations and individuals through whom the plan furnishes these services.

During a prenatal care conference with a doctor on the staff of the defendant, Permanente Clinic, plaintiff’s parents told the doctor that if the child…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gill v. SellingOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rennewanz v. DeanOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olson v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Fernando Pavon v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Veselenak v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API