Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1977No. TC 7344, SC 24627PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*201TONGUE, J.

This is an action to collect from an insurance company a judgment of $25,000 in punitive damages entered against defendant’s insured for reckless driving. Plaintiff appeals from a trial court decision on stipulated facts that defendant insurance company is not liable.

Plaintiff was injured in a collision with an automobile driven by defendant’s insured, Mrs. Linnie Ames. The jury returned verdicts against Mrs. Ames for $70,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages. The award of punitive damages, based on evidence that defendant’s insured had been guilty of reckless…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Crull v. GlebMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brown v. MaxeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Cieslewicz Ex Rel. Finerty v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Fort Pierre v. United Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API