Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Argued and submitted November 8, 1979. JOSEPH, J.
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
This is an action for intentional interference with contractual relations. Plaintiff was employed by Trans-Mark Services, Inc. and Kansas City Southern Railway Company 1 (KCS), as sales manager in the Portland office. Defendant Pollard (defendant) was employed by KCS as a regional vice president. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Pollard intentionally and wrongfully interferred with his employment contract and caused him to be fired.
The jury returned a verdict against defendant, awarding $100,000 as general damages and $1,000 as punitive damages, and judgment was entered on the verdict.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Crooks v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Caldwell v. Pop's Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Winnett v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Boers v. Payline Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.