Legal Opinion

Hall v. Work

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1960PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

This is an action by plaintiff, Harry H. Hall, against the defendant, A. M. Work, doing business as Billingsley Motors, to recover both compensatory and punitive damages for the conversion of an automobile and certain personal effects therein. After both parties had rested the defendant moved the court to withdraw from the jury the issue of punitive damages. The court was of the opinion that the motion should be allowed but at the request of the plaintiff, pursuant to ORS 18.140 (2),① submitted the issue to the jury. The judge advised the parties that if the jury awarded plaintiff a verdict…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Graham v. MerchantOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Swank v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Fredeen v. StrideOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Stone MacHinery Co. v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Mooney v. Johnson Cattle Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Rollins v. LeiboldAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API