Legal Opinion

People v. Rush

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from St. Clair; Vance, J. Louis Rush was convicted of illegally selling intoxicating liquors.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent was convicted of illegal sales of intoxicating liquors.

The first errors assigned relate to the insufficiency of the complaint, which was made upon information and belief. The record shows the written complaint to have been made upon information and belief. The complaint charges a specific offense by apt words and phrases. The warrant recites, after setting up the making of the complaint, and what it contained, “Whereas, on examination on oath of the said Joseph T. Minnie by me, the said justice of the peace, it appears to me, the said justice of the peace, that said offense has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Sullings v. ShakespeareMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. EvertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. AplinMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stowell v. Standard Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. KnopkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. State v. Salisbury Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API