Legal Opinion

Sullings v. Shakespeare

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Sullings sued Shakespeare, who was publisher of the Kalamazoo Gazette, for publishing two alleged libels. One was claimed to be libelous because describing plaintiff as having performed a surgical operation by removing a “patty tuber” from the “hypogastrium” of one A. B. Smith. . The other contained an account of a ride taken by plaintiff in Kalamazoo written in a style tending to throw ridicule on plaintiff as displaying ostentation, and as not used to such indulgences.

The jury found a verdict for defendant. The case went throughout, and the charge also was based, on the theory that the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCracken v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Bourreseau v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cochrane v. WittboldMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. McAllister v. Detroit Free Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API