People v. Everts
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Genesee; Wisner, J. William T. Everts was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors without having given a bond.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Respondent was charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquor without having given the bond, as required by law. The testimony was furnished by two detectives, who had been promised a reward for the detection and conviction of persons engaged in the business in the village of Fenton. The respondent, among other requests, preferred the following:
“ The encouragement of criminals to induce them to commit crime, in order to get up a prosecution against them, is scandalous and reprehensible.”
All the other requests of respondent appear to have been given. The court did charge, at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. LiphardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- People v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Whittington v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.