People v. Bechtel
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Bay. (Cobb, J.) Respondent was convicted of engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer without having paid the required tax. The facts are stated in- the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The defendant was convicted in the circuit court for Bay county on March 14, 1890, upon an infor*624mation charging that on December 6, 1889, he was engaged in the business of selling and offering for sale spirituous and intoxicating liquors, and malt, brewed, and fermented liquors, at retail, and that being so engaged he did, on said December 6, unlawfully offer for sale spirituous and intoxicating liquors to one Peter Tierney, he not being a druggist, and not having paid to the county treasurer the tax required by law for selling and offering for sale such liquors.
The defendant, having been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Yaner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. LynchMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. McGreeveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. McClinticMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Fertig v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Brown v. HadwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.