State v. Salisbury Ice & Fuel Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Long, J., at September Term, 1913, of Row AN.
1Opinion of the CourtClakk, C. J.
This is a petition to “review the record and reconsider the opinion filed in this case before certification to the lower court, on account of an alleged palpable oversight therein.” This is a criminal action in which the defendant is indicted for false pretense in obtaining money by means of short weight in coal. The petition to reconsider relies upon the evidence of the prosecutor, in that" when he was asked, “Yet you allowed the money to be paid the driver, thinking and feeling and knowing at the time that the ton of coke was at least 200 pounds short?” he answered, “To the best of my…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.