Legal Opinion

People v. Row

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1904No. Docket No. 232PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Oceana; Russell, J. Isaiah Row was convicted'of statutory rape.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, O. J.

The respondent was convicted of the statutory offense of rape upon his 12-year-old daughter. He has brought the case here on exceptions before sentence.

Respondent objected to any witnesses being sworn, for the reason that the complaint before the justice was made upon information and belief, and a warrant based thereon was not a valid one. This objection was not made in the justice’s court, and an examination was had there. It also appeared at the trial in the circuit court that, before the warrant was issued, .the daughter of the respondent was examined orally. We do not think…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Strudgeon v. Village of Sand BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Geary v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People v. DeFranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Swift Electric Light Co. v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. HeftMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. LiggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. MusserMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Nickels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API