People v. Aplin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Respondent was convicted of burglary, and sentenced to the State House of Correction and Reformatory at Ionia for five years. The facts are stated in the opinion. •
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The respondent was convicted of burglary.
Two errors are alleged upon which he asks for a reversal of his conviction:
1. That-a disqualified juror sat upon the panel.1
2. That the building into which the respondent broke and entered was not within the curtilage.
1. We need not determine the qualifications of the *394juror under this record, because the defendant did not challenge the juror peremptorily, nor exhaust his peremptory challenges. Until a respondent has exercised all his peremptory challenges, he cannot be heard to complain of the retention of an alleged incompetent juror. Sullings v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sullings v. ShakespeareMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Stowell v. Standard Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Stevens v. Union Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
- Commercial Bank v. ChatfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.