State v. . Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from W. B. Allen, J., at February Term, 1910, of Wake. The facts are stated in the opinion of thé Court.
1Opinion of the CourtClabk, C. J.
The defendant was indicted for retailing whiskey. The evidence for the State tended to show that J. P. Stell, the chief of police of Raleigh, furnished certain money to witness Hammock with which to buy liquor, and, also, additional pay for his services in the matter, and under orders of the chief of police he went to the defendant, in company with one Pope, a city policeman, and purchased intoxicating liquor of the defendant, with the view of having him indicted and punished in the court of the police justice of the city of Raleigh.
Tbe sole question presented by tbe appeal is whether this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- City of Evanston v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. EvertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. Salisbury Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.