Legal Opinion
Covad Communications Co. v. Revonet, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 24, 2008No. Civil No. 06-1892 (CKK/JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Covad Communications Company (“Covad”) brought this action against defendant Revonet, Inc. alleging that Revonet misappropriated and converted confidential, proprietary and trade secret information— namely, sales leads generated by or for Co-*148vad—and breached its contract with Revo-net. This case was referred to me for management of discovery. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff filed its Motion of Covad Communications Company to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents [# 43] (“Pis. Mot.”).
I. Background.
Cova…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- National Union Electric Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- D'Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Peskoff v. FaberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sekisui American Corp. v. HartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Newman v. Borders, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009