Legal Opinion
Covad Communications Company v. Revonet Inc
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 27, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2006-1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to me for the resolution of discovery disputes. The issues now before the Court are (1) whether plaintiff Covad Communications Company (“Co-vad”) should be permitted to conduct a forensic search of defendant Revonet, Inc.’s (“Revonet”) computers and servers; (2) how those searches should be conducted; and (3) who should pay for them.
I. Background.
The history of this ease appears in previous opinions. See generally Covad Communications Co. v. Revonet, 254 F.R.D. 147 (D.D.C.2008); Covad Communications…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John B. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Executive Air Taxi Corp. v. City of Bismarck, NDCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. Café AsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Peskoff v. FaberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bennett v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Scott Process Sys., Inc. v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- 4WEB, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.