Covad Communications Company v. Revonet Inc
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This case has been referred to me for management of discovery. Discovery in this case has bee$ most fractious, yielding several opinions 1 and orders and some of the latter have granted or denied sanctions.
In September, 2008, both parties to this litigation filed motions to compel responses to written discovery requests. I resolved Covad Communications Co.’s (“Covad”) Motion to Compel [# 43] on December 24, 2008. Covad Commc’ns Co. v. Revonet, Inc., 254 F.R.D. 147, 151 (D.D.C.2008). Covad has now filed its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- United States v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wyeth v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hansen v. Country Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Lamaute v. SteeleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Suzette De Souza v. The State of New York, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026