Legal Opinion
Covad Communications Company v. Revonet Inc
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2006-1892PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before me are nine discovery motions that are awaiting resolution. Three of these motions relate to plaintiffs claims that spoliation occurred, and the outcome of the motion for sanctions because of the spoliation may have a dispositive effect on the case. I will not address defendant’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding the Forensic Copying and Searching Described in the Court’s Order of May 27, 2009 [# 140], plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Revonet’s Spoliation of Evidence [# 146], and defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Parker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sekisui American Corp. v. HartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Office of Science and Technology PolicyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.