Legal Opinion
Peskoff v. Faber
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2008No. Civil Action No. 04-526 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Background
This Court previously addressed the sufficiency of the search done by defendant Mi*60chael Faber for e-mails and other electronically stored information in response to plaintiff Jonathon Peskoffs discovery requests, and determined that it was “appropriate to ascertain the cost of forensic testing of the computers and server at issue to see if it justifies a forensic search of them.” Peskoff v. Faber, 244 F.R.D. 54, 63 (D.D.C. 2007). The parties submitted a joint bid proposal, Request for Proposals from Qualified…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Wiginton v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Kirschenman v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- Simms v. Center for Correctional Health & Policy StudiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Boeynaems v. La Fitness International, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Covad Communications Co. v. Revonet, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.