Newman v. Borders, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before me are two motions, one to compel another 30(b)(6) deposition 1 and the second to modify Judge Roberts’ order limiting the number of depositions that can be taken to eight. 2
The facts of the case are simple indeed. On December 2, 2005, a store detective employed by Borders, a defendant, approached the plaintiff and questioned him. Plaintiff claims that the stop was racially motivated and Borders intends to defend itself on the grounds that plaintiff was questioned because the store detective saw him “place an item from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huthnance v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Doe v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Intervet, Inc. v. Merial Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Covad Communications Co. v. Revonet, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwards v. McDermott International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
- Sessoms v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2026
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019