Procacina v. Susen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
In 1979, Appellants filed a complaint in trespass [Lawsuit # 1] with the Arbitration Panels for Health Care. 1 The complaint alleged, inter alia, injuries to Anthony Procacina resulting from the use of a solution known as Pantopaque which was administered to him for the purpose of taking myelograms. The complaint named all the defendants named in this case, except appellee Taylor Pharmacal Company, who was later joined as an additional defendant by defendant Lafayette Pharmacal.
In 1980, and thus after the complaint was filed, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled, in Mattos v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mattos v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hessenbruch v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Commonwealth ex rel. Lindsley v. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Glazer v. Cambridge Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Barren v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Virginia Mansions Condominium Ass'n v. LamplSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Davis Cookie Co., Inc. v. WasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Richner v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Rostock v. AnzaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.