Legal Opinion

Davis Cookie Co., Inc. v. Wasley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1989No. 1203PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In these consolidated appeals we address two significant procedural issues regarding permissive counterclaims under Pa.R.C.P. 1031.

First, we are called upon to determine whether the Luzerne County trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant allowance to amend an answer with new matter to assert a permissive counterclaim under Pa.R.C.P. 1033. We quash this appeal as having been taken improvidently from an interlocutory and unappealable order.

Second, we are called upon to determine whether the Clarion County trial court erred granting dismissal on the basis of the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Hessenbruch v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. PNC Bank v. Bluestream Technology, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Crutchfield v. Eaton Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Carringer v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Hilkmann v. HilkmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Richner v. McCanceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API