Legal Opinion

Barren v. Commonwealth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 2013PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

Pro se Appellant, David Morris Barren, appeals from the order entered in the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas dismissing his action in replevin. The trial court reasoned that his action requested the same relief he sought in a pending criminal matter. Appellant contends that the court erred because the relief requested was not the same, Pa.R.Civ.P. 1079.1 permits him to pursue the instant case, and dismissal would violate the Pennsylvania and United States Constitutions. We hold that when a litigant institutes a civil action against the Commonwealth requesting the same…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PalmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. JandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Beaston v. EbersoleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Siekierda v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reinoso, G. v. Heritage Warminster SPESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Matharu v. MuirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re: Smith, A., Appeal of: Smith, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Bollard & Assoc., Inc. v. Schmidt, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Berry, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API