Legal Opinion

Mattos v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1980No. 124 E.D. Misc. Docket 1979PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*387OPINION OF THE COURT

NIX, Justice.

This case presents us with a renewed challenge to the Pennsylvania Health Care Services Malpractice (Act).1 We upheld the constitutionality of this Act in Parker v. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 483 Pa. 106, 394 A.2d 932 (1978), with the caveat that “[i]t is an accepted principle of constitutional law that deference to a coequal branch of government requires that we accord a reasonable period of .. . time to test the effectiveness of legislation.” Id., 483 Pa. at 121, 394 A.2d at 940.

After our decision in Parker, petitioner Mattos filed an action in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Moore v. JamiesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Fletcher v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Rosemarie T. Schwilm, Administratrix of the Estate of Carrol A. Schwilm, Deceased v. Thomas J. Holbrook, M.D. And Cabell Huntington HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API