Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Lindsley v. Robinson

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1977No. 218 Misc. DocketPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

To a petition for review in the nature of mandamus of petitioner pro se, Rodney Anthony Lindsley, Jr. (petitioner), the-sixteen named respondents have filed preliminary objections: (1) in the nature of a demurrer; (2) raising the defense of pendency of a prior action, Pa. R.C.P. No. 1017(b)(5); and (3) challenging this Court’s jurisdiction in mandamus.1

I. Demurrer

Respondents’ preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer admits as true all well and clearly *99pleaded material and relevant factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Yania…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Herman Jackson, Jr. v. James B. Godwin, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Tindell v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Allen v. ColauttiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Madden v. JeffesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Feldman v. Lafayette Green Condominium Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API