Commonwealth ex rel. Lindsley v. Robinson
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
To a petition for review in the nature of mandamus of petitioner pro se, Rodney Anthony Lindsley, Jr. (petitioner), the-sixteen named respondents have filed preliminary objections: (1) in the nature of a demurrer; (2) raising the defense of pendency of a prior action, Pa. R.C.P. No. 1017(b)(5); and (3) challenging this Court’s jurisdiction in mandamus.1
I. Demurrer
Respondents’ preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer admits as true all well and clearly *99pleaded material and relevant factual averments and all inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Yania…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Herman Jackson, Jr. v. James B. Godwin, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Tindell v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Allen v. ColauttiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Madden v. JeffesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Feldman v. Lafayette Green Condominium Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.