Legal Opinion

Glazer v. Cambridge Industries, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1980No. 1805PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint following Preliminary Objections on the grounds of lis pendens.

This is the third suit arising out of a shareholders agreement entered into by Arnold Cohen and Abraham Glazer, which created Leader Industries, Inc. The corporate stock of Leader Industries, Inc., is owned fifty percent by Cohen and fifty percent by Glazer. The shareholders agreement provides in pertinent part:

1.3 The initial and principle business of Corporation is the manufacture and sale of furniture.' Cohen is presently in the bedding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Hessenbruch v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Dickerson v. Dickersons Overseas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Pantazis v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. PNC Bank v. Bluestream Technology, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Penox Technologies, Inc. v. Foster Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Engel v. Teleprompter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Norristown Auto. Co., Inc. v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API