Legal Opinion

Richner v. McCance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 2011PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellant, Erie Insurance Exchange (“Erie”), appeals from the trial court’s order entered October 30, 2009 overruling preliminary objections. In its preliminary objections, Erie contended that the second count of Appellee Matthew Richner’s (“Richner”) amended complaint should have been dismissed on two grounds: (1) the doctrine of lis pendens, given the pen-dency of a prior-filed action in Butler County, and (2) the two causes of action in Richner’s amended complaint, namely a third party motor vehicle accident claim and an action seeking a declaration on the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Addison Terrace Phase 4 v. Hunter, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Calisto, M. v. Rodgers, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. McGlinden, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Miller, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Estate of Anna Marie LeipoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API