Legal Opinion

DeWitt v. Balben

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1986No. 85-127, 85-128PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This appeal involves certain water rights to a well. An action was brought by James H. DeWitt II, George E. Baker II, Anne T. DeWitt, Hillcrest Investment Partnership, and Hillcrest Water, Inc. (hereinafter plaintiffs) against Edward C. Balben, Marion C. Balben d/b/a Hillcrest Development Company (hereinafter defendants)1 to determine the plaintiffs’ rights in a water well located on the defendants’ property. After trial to the court, a lengthy judgment was entered. The parties dispute who actually prevailed. In Case No. 85-127, the plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Heyl v. HeylWyoming Supreme Court · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cline v. Rocky Mountain, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API