Legal Opinion

Duke v. Housen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1979No. 4811PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Chief Justice.

In the appeal now before the court, appellant-defendant challenges the jury verdict and district court judgment entered against him awarding to appellee-plaintiff, based upon defendant’s alleged grossly negligent infection of plaintiff with venereal disease, compensatory and punitive damages in the sum of $1,300,000. Through this appellate challenge, defendant raises the following questions:

*3381. Is the action barred by a statute of limitations?

2. Are the damages excessive?

3. Is the defense of assumption of risk or other defense a bar to plaintiff’s recovery as a matter of…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. B.N. v. K.KCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API