Legal Opinion

McLain v. Anderson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-21PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Dorothy M. McLain, Margo L. Nelsen, and David A. Nelsen, some of the neighbors (neighbors) of Jerry A. Anderson and Faith K. Anderson (Andersons), instituted this action to enjoin claimed violations of certain restrictive covenants attached to a rural subdivision. They also sought to recover a $25.00 per day penalty together with attorney fees. Both attorney fees and the continuing penalty are provided for in the covenants. The neighbors assert that the trial court erred in construing the term “residence” as being a “lot” in the paragraph of the covenants relating to keeping…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jones Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank of OmahaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Anderson v. BommerWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miles v. CEC Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Town of PinedaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In the Interest of Cra, a Minor Child. Db v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Goglio v. Star Valley Ranch Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. White v. Shane Edeburn Construction, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API