Legal Opinion

Cline v. Rocky Mountain, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2000No. 99-38, 99-39PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

In Case No. 99-38, Mike Cline (Mike) and Brenda Cline (Brenda) appeal from the district court’s order granting, in part, Rocky Mountain, Inc. d/b/a Chinook Log Homes’ (Chinook) request for reimbursement of its attorneys’ fees and costs. In Case No. 99-39, Chinook appeals from the portion of the district court’s order which denied it part of its attorneys’ fees and costs and from the order denying. its motion for ■ a new trial.

We affirm the district court’s decisions in both cases.

ISSUES

The Clines phrase the issues in Case No. 99-38 as follows:

I. Did the District Court Err in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Wolter v. Equitable Resources Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Miles v. CEC Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DeWitt v. BalbenWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Air Freight, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Western Watersheds Project v. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API