Legal Opinion

MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty Trust

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2006No. 05-80, 05-81PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] The dispositive issue in this case was whether deeds reserving “oil rights” which were executed in the 1940s in Campbell County, effectively reserved gas rights without a specific reference to “gas.” In these consolidated appeals, Mullinnix, LLC and John W. Hickman, Fred J. Boyce and Lane Boyce (hereinafter referred to as Hick-mans) contest the district court’s order quiet ing title in gas rights in the appellees. The district court examined extrinsic evidence of the trade usage of the term “oil rights” at the time and place of the execution of the deeds and concluded the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Caballo Coal Company v. Fidelity Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jason Thornock v. Pacificorp, an Oregon CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. Thunder Basin Coal Co., LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bear Peak Resources, LLC v. Peak Powder River Resources, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API