Legal Opinion

Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 9, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0073PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this challenge to appellee Pima County’s zoning actions concerning certain real property, appellants Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc., and others 1 (collectively, McLoughlin) appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of Pima County. McLoughlin argues the trial court erred by rejecting its claims that Pima County had violated its constitutional due process rights, violated the notice and hearing provisions in A.R.S. § 11-829(C) and Pima County Code (P.C.C.) § 18.91.060(B)(1), and acted without jurisdiction in violation of § 11-829 and P.C.C. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Steven J. Harris v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Tritschler v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Mining Investment Group, LLC v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. BASELINE FINANCIAL SERVICES v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API