Legal Opinion
Orme School v. Reeves
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1990No. CV-89-0403-SAPublishedCited by 578 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Orme School (Orme) initiated an original special action 1 proceeding in this court, claiming that the trial judge abused his discretion and acted without legal authority in denying its motion for summary judgment. We accepted jurisdiction to reconsider our present standards for summary judgment in light of recent United States Supreme Court decisions interpreting the federal analog of Rule 56, Ariz.R.Civ.P., 16 A.R.S.
We have jurisdiction under article 6, § 5(1) of the Arizona Constitution and Rule 7(a), Ariz.R.P.Spec.Act., 17B A.R.S.
JURISDICTION
We decide…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by578 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Zilisch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2000
573 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.