Legal Opinion
Steven J. Harris v. County of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1990No. 88-6498PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEYER, Circuit Judge:
Steven J. Harris appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the County of Riverside, California (the County). Harris owns a small piece of land in the County which he has used for various business purposes including renting all terrain vehicles (ATVs). He claims that by rezoning his property as residential and imposing bureaucratic roadblocks to his ability to comply with County land use procedures, the County has taken his property in violation of his fifth amendment rights and violated his fourteenth amendment rights to procedural and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nasierowski Brothers Investment Company v. City of Sterling HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.