Legal Opinion

Horn v. County of Ventura

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1979No. L.A. 30959PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*610Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

— In this mandamus action, we consider whether approval by defendant county of a tentative subdivision map is an “adjudicatory” function which, under principles of due process, requires that both appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard be given to persons whose property interests may be significantly affected. We will hold that such approval is “adjudicatory,” and that rights to prior notice and hearing are accordingly invoked. We will further conclude that the county’s general procedures for public notice of environmental decisions were constitutionally…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Steven J. Harris v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API