Legal Opinion

In Re Murchison.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1955No. 405PublishedCited by 2,179 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Michigan law authorizes any judge of its courts of record to act as a so-called “one-man grand jury.” 1 He can compel witnesses to appear before him in secret to testify about suspected crimes. We have previously held that such a Michigan “judge-grand jury” cannot consistently with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment summarily convict a witness of contempt for *134conduct in the secret hearings. In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257. We held that before such a conviction could stand, due process requires as a minimum that an accused be given a public trial after reasonable notice of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,179 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

2,174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API