In Re Murchison.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Michigan law authorizes any judge of its courts of record to act as a so-called “one-man grand jury.” 1 He can compel witnesses to appear before him in secret to testify about suspected crimes. We have previously held that such a Michigan “judge-grand jury” cannot consistently with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment summarily convict a witness of contempt for *134conduct in the secret hearings. In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257. We held that before such a conviction could stand, due process requires as a minimum that an accused be given a public trial after reasonable notice of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,179 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
2,174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.