Legal Opinion
Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1959No. 6880PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court holding invalid the zoning ordinances which regulate the use of property within the unincorporated areas of Maricopa County. The appellee, Bayless Investment and Trading Company, brought a suit in which it was alleged, inter alia, that the zoning ordinances were of no effect because the requisite notice of hearings — both before the Zoning Commission and the Board of'- Supervisors — had not been given. The trial court, agreeing with this contention, found the ordinances to be void. This •appeal was taken by the Board of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Fiesta Mall Venture v. Mecham Recall CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Montgomery v. Bremer County Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.