Legal Opinion

Musselman v. Phillips

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 10, 1997No. Civ. A. No. WMN-96-4075PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case has been assigned to me for the resolution of discovery disputes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 301 (D.Md.1997). Presently pending before the Court is a dispute regarding the discoverability of certain information communicated by plaintiffs counsel to two experts who have been retained to testify at trial on behalf of the plaintiff. This Memorandum and Order deals with certain of these documents, namely seven letters from counsel for the plaintiff to the experts. For reasons set forth below, I will order that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Twin Laboratories Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
  4. Synthes Spine Co., L.P. v. WaldenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Under Armour, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API